Search Results for author:
Found 5 papers, 1 papers with code
Human-centred explanation of rule-based decision-making systems in the legal domain
We propose a human-centred explanation method for rule-based automated decision-making systems in the legal domain.
Contrastive Explanations for Argumentation-Based Conclusions
In this paper we discuss contrastive explanations for formal argumentation - the question why a certain argument (the fact) can be accepted, whilst another argument (the foil) cannot be accepted under various extension-based semantics.
Necessary and Sufficient Explanations in Abstract Argumentation
In this paper, we discuss necessary and sufficient explanations for formal argumentation - the question whether and why a certain argument can be accepted (or not) under various extension-based semantics.
Relevance in Structured Argumentation
Syntactic criteria have been proposed in the domain of relevance logic and were recently used in argumentation theory under the names of non-interference and crash-resistance.
An argumentative agent-based model of scientific inquiry
In this paper we present an agent-based model (ABM) of scientific inquiry aimed at investigating how different social networks impact the efficiency of scientists in acquiring knowledge.
