Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learning

22 Jan 2018  ·  Qimai Li, Zhichao Han, Xiao-Ming Wu ·

Many interesting problems in machine learning are being revisited with new deep learning tools. For graph-based semisupervised learning, a recent important development is graph convolutional networks (GCNs), which nicely integrate local vertex features and graph topology in the convolutional layers. Although the GCN model compares favorably with other state-of-the-art methods, its mechanisms are not clear and it still requires a considerable amount of labeled data for validation and model selection. In this paper, we develop deeper insights into the GCN model and address its fundamental limits. First, we show that the graph convolution of the GCN model is actually a special form of Laplacian smoothing, which is the key reason why GCNs work, but it also brings potential concerns of over-smoothing with many convolutional layers. Second, to overcome the limits of the GCN model with shallow architectures, we propose both co-training and self-training approaches to train GCNs. Our approaches significantly improve GCNs in learning with very few labels, and exempt them from requiring additional labels for validation. Extensive experiments on benchmarks have verified our theory and proposals.

PDF Abstract

Results from the Paper


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Node Classification Brazil Air-Traffic Union (Li et al., 2018) Accuracy 0.466 # 4
Node Classification Brazil Air-Traffic Intersection (Li et al., 2018) Accuracy 0.459 # 5
Node Classification Europe Air-Traffic Intersection (Li et al., 2018) Accuracy 44.3 # 4
Node Classification Facebook Intersection (Li et al., 2018) Accuracy 59.8 # 3
Node Classification Flickr Intersection (Li et al., 2018) Accuracy 0.557 # 5
Node Classification Wiki-Vote Union (Li et al., 2018) Accuracy 46.3 # 4

Results from Other Papers


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Rank Source Paper Compare
Node Classification USA Air-Traffic Intersection (Li et al., 2018) Accuracy 57.3 # 6
Node Classification USA Air-Traffic Union (Li et al., 2018) Accuracy 58.2 # 5

Methods